Assessment of environment of an area’s social vulnerability: ecological aspect


Purpose. The purpose of the current research is identification and integral estimation of ecological determinants of forming environment of an area’s social vulnerability (on the example of the oblasts of the Carpathian region of Ukraine).

Methodology / approach. The empirics of environment of the social vulnerability based on the identification of ecological components is carried out by construction of commensurate series of indicators’ values through the normalizing for each group of parameters, in particular, within the selected set of areas (oblasts of the Carpathian region). The construction of time series of significance coefficients (calculation of weight coefficients) stipulates the use of the theory of sensitivity, while the calculation of the integral coefficient of the social vulnerability natural environment requires the multiplicative approach.

Results. The calculated integral coefficients of the natural environment of social vulnerability contributed to determining the living standards of the population of the natural resource sector and showed a significant socio-ecological divergence among the oblasts of the Carpathian region and Ukraine. In 2019, the highest values of integral coefficients of social vulnerability natural environment in the Carpathian region of Ukraine were observed in Ivano-Frankivsk (0.574) and Chernivtsi (0.391) oblasts. Ivano-Frankivsk oblast was the leader in that regard throughout the studied period.

Originality / scientific novelty. The methodological approach for analyzing the social vulnerability of the area has been improved, which, unlike the traditional ones based on determinants of the social, economic, and political environment, provides for a comprehensive analysis of the sensitivity of changes in the social vulnerability of the territory regarding the changes in the natural environment determinants.

Practical value / implications. The paper offers and substantiates a methodological approach to the estimation of ecological determinants as the indicators of an area’s vulnerability growth, which serves as the information-analytical base for the development of the initiative-taking social vulnerability reduction policy.


Beroya-Eitner, M. A. (2016). Ecological vulnerability indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 329–334.

Berrouet, L. M., Machado, J., & Villegas-Palaci, C. (2018). Vulnerability of socio-ecological systems: a conceptual framework. Ecological Indicators, 84, 632–647.

Birkmann, J., Buckle, P., Jaeger, J., Pelling, M., Setiadi, N., Garschagen, M., Fernando, N., & Kropp, J. (2008). Extreme events and disasters: a window of opportunity for change? Analysis of organizational, institutional and political changes, formal and informal responses after mega-disasters. Natural Hazards, 55, 637–655.

Boiko, V., Mulska, O., Baranyak, I., & Levytska, O. (2021). Ukrainian migration aspirations towards Germany: analysis and development scenarios. Comparative Economic Research, 24(1), 65–84.

Breil, M., Downing, C., Kazmierczak, A., Mäkinen, K., Romanovska, L., Terämä, E., & Swart, R. J. (2018). Social vulnerability to climate change in European cities–state of play in policy and Practice. EEA–European Environment Agency. Available at:

Chervinska, I. (2015). The establishment of the socio-cultural space of mountain schools of the Carpathian region of Ukraine: problems and development prospects. Intellectual Archive. Serio “Education & Pedagogic”, 4(4), 8–14.

Eakin, H. (2005). Institutional change, climate risk and rural vulnerability: cases from Central Mexico. World Development, 33, 1923–1938.

Fekete, A. (2008). The scale dependence of social and ecological vulnerability in context to river floods in Germany. EGU General Assembly 2008, Geophysical Research Abstracts, 10, Vienna.

Fuchs, S., & Glade, T. (2016). Foreword: Vulnerability assessment in natural hazard risk – a dynamic perspective. Natural Hazards, 82(1), 1–5.

Kazakova, I. (2016). The impact of global changes at soil resources and agricultural production. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2(1), 21–44. Available at:

Kok, M., Lüdeke, M., Lucas, P., Sterzel, T., Walther, C., Janssen, P., Sietz, D., & de Soysa, I. (2016). A new method for analysing socio-ecological patterns of vulnerability. Regional Environmental Change, 16(1), 229–243.

Kravtsiv, V. S. (Eds.) (2013). Karpatskyi rehion: aktualni problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku [The Carpathian region: problems and prospects of development]. NAS of Ukraine; Institute of Regional Research, Lviv. Available at:

Lee, Y.-J. (2014). Social vulnerability indicators as a sustainable planning tool. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 44, 31–42.

Medvedeva, Y., Kucher, A., Lipsa, J., & Hełdak, M. (2021). Human health risk assessment on the consumption of apples growing in urbanized areas: case of Kharkiv, Ukraine. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1504.

Mulska, O., Levytska, O., Panchenko, V., Kohut, M., & Vasyltsiv, T. (2020). Causality of external population migration intensity and regional socio-economic development of Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(3), 426–437.,2020.3.

Pysarenko, S. M. (2014). Competitiveness improvement of the industrial potential of the Carpathian region. Regional Economy, 4, 55–63. Available at:

Rudel, T. K. (2008). Meta-analyses of case studies: a method for studying regional and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 18–25.

Sebesvari, Z., Renaud, F. G., Haas, S., Tessler, Z., Hagenlocher, M., Kloos, J., Szabo, S., … & Kuenzer, C. (2016). A review of vulnerability indicators for deltaic social-ecological systems. Sustainability Science, 11, 575–590.

Semiv, S., Berezivskiy, Y., Baranyak, I., Mulska, O., & Ivaniuk, U. (2021). Priorities and tools of regulation of external migration in the Carpathian region of Ukraine. Agricultural and Resource Economics, 7(2), 160–181.

Sietz, D. (2014). Regionalisation of global insights into dryland vulnerability: better reflecting smallholders’ vulnerability in Northeast Brazil. Global Environmental Change, 25, 173–185.

Sowman, M., & Raemaekers, S. (2018). Socio-ecological vulnerability assessment in coastal communities in the BCLME region. Journal of Marine Systems, 188, 160–171.

State Statistics Service of Ukraine (n.d.). Regions of Ukraine, 2010, 2015–2019. URL:

Syntyk, N., Humenyuk, V., Sych, O., & Yasinovska, I. (2020). Development of the Carpathian region in the context of EU macro-regional strategy. Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning, 11(1), 31–43.

Tsybulska, J., & Demedyuk, O. (2015). The challenges and prospects for development of the Carpathian region. Eurolimes, 19, 2015–220. Available at:

Wolch, J. R. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: the challenge of making cities “just green enough”. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244.

How to Cite
Mulska, O., Vasyltsiv, T., Levytska, O., Osinska, O., & Kunytska-Iliash, M. (2022). Assessment of environment of an area’s social vulnerability: ecological aspect. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 8(3), 60-80.