Sustainable use of land in danger of wind erosion in Ukraine: stakeholder engagement

  • Anatolii Kucher NSC «Institute for Soil Science and Agrochemistry Research named after O. N. Sokolovsky»
  • Iryna Kazakova National Scientific Center «Institute for Soil Science and Agrochemistry Research named after O. N. Sokolovsky»
  • Lesia Kucher Kharkiv National Agrarian University named after V. V. Dokuchayev
  • Antonia Schraml Humboldt University of Berlin
  • Hekuran Koka Lezha Regional Development Agency
  • Warren Priest Independent scientist
Keywords: Wind erosion, Sustainable use of land, Stakeholders analysis, Stakeholder engagement


In the modern world overcoming the problems of soil erosion and the transition to the sustainable use of land, especially land involved in agricultural production, is impossible without the broad involvement of all interested and stakeholding parties in solving these problems. Dialogue with stakeholders is a key element of effective management at individual farm and state levels. Currently in Ukraine, there is considerable scope and need for significant improvements in this area as only a small number of companies (industrial, commercial) involved in the agricultural sector have developed stakeholder engagement tools, and only one is actively involved in dialogue with stakeholders. This paper presents research focusing on the village of Pishcha in Volyn region, Ukraine. It examines the theoretical and methodological aspects of: identifying key stakeholders, determining their interests (explicit and implicit) and the possible impact of these on the project; project preparation and implementation; the identification of apparent or potential conflicts between the interests of different stakeholders, and the possibility of reconciling these interests and establishing constructive relationships between them; the forms of participation appropriate to each of the stakeholders at each stage of the project cycle; and, the possibilities for the monitoring and evaluation processes, especially participatory methods that look to involve interested parties. The paper also sets out a provisional budget (facilitation needed, personnel and staffing required) for and discusses the feasibility of the implementation of the engagement process of stakeholders for the promotion and roll out of promising options for the sustainable use of land in danger of wind erosion in Ukraine.


ELD Initiative (2015), The value of land: Prosperous lands and positive rewards through sustainable land management, available at:

Edward B. Barbier and Jacob P. Hochard (2014), Land Degradation, Less Favored Lands and the Rural Poor: A Spatial and Economic Analysis. A Report for the Economics of Land Degradation Initiative. Department of Economics and Finance, University of Wyoming, available at:

ELD Initiative (2014), Principles of economic valuation for sustainable land management based on the Massive Open Online Course «The Economics of Land Degradation». Practitioner’s Guide, available at:

Kucher, A., Kazakova, I., Kucher, L., Kozak, H., Schraml, A., Koka, H. and Priest, W. (2015), Economics of soil degradation and sustainable use of land in danger of wind erosion. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, [Online], vol. 1, no. 1, available at:

Reed, M., Stringer, L., Dougill, A., Perkins, J., Atlhopheng, J., Mulale, K. and Favretto, N. (2015), Reorienting land degradation towards sustainable land management: linking sustainable livelihoods with ecosystem services in rangeland systems. Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 151, pp. 472–485.

ELD Initiative (2015), Pathways and options for action and stakeholder engagement, based on the 2015 ELD Massive Open Online Course «Stakeholder Engagement». Practitioner’s Guide, available at:

Cramb, R. A., Garcia, J. N. M., Gerrits, R. V. and Saguiguit, G. C. (1999), Smallholder adoption of soil conservation technologies: evidence from upland projects in the Philippines. Land Degradation & Development, vol. 10, pp. 405–423.

Arnstein, S. (1969), A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, vol. 35(4), pp. 216–224.

Blackstock, K. L., Kelly, G. J. and Horsey, B. L. (2007), Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research sustainability. Ecological Economics, vol. 60(4), pp. 726–742.

Neef, A. and Dieter, N. (2011), Stakeholder participation in agricultural research projects: a conceptual framework for reflection and decision-making. Agriculture and Human Values, vol. 28.2, pp. 179–194.

Quillérou E. and Falk T. Stakeholder engagement and the Economics of Land Degradation (ELD) Initiative, аvailable at:

Reed, M. S. (2008), Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, vol. 141, is. 10, pp. 2417–2431.

Aaltonen, S. and Kreutz, E. (2009), Engage your stakeholders: stakeholder involvement toolkit for local authorities, available at:

Reed, M. and Attlee, A. (2015), Knowledge exchange training for research impacts. Unpublished training manual, Sustainable Learning project and Living with Environmental Change programme. 2nd Ed

Dawn, R. and Khattri, N. (2012), Designing a Results Framework for Achieving Results: A How-to Guide. Independent Evaluation Group. The World Bank, Washington, DC.

How to Cite
Kucher, A., Kazakova, I., Kucher, L., Schraml, A., Koka, H., & Priest, W. (2015). Sustainable use of land in danger of wind erosion in Ukraine: stakeholder engagement. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 1(2), 5-28.

Most read articles by the same author(s)